An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews
OBJECTIVES One recommended use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach is supporting quality assessment of evidence of comparisons included within a Cochrane overview of reviews. Within our overview, reviewers found that current GRADE guidance was insufficient to make reliable and consistent judgments. To support our ratings, we developed an alg...
متن کاملAn Introduction to Living Systematic Reviews
سخن سردبیر Editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره 20، اردیبهشت 1400، 146-145 درآمدی بر مرورهای نظام‌مند زنده An Introduction to Living Systematic Reviews محسن رضائیان[1] M. Rezaeian تا کنون در سخنان سردبیری مجله دانشگاه، درباره انواع مقالات مروری، مطالب گوناگونی را به رشته تحریر در آورده‌ایم. هدف از نگارش این مقالات، آشنا ساختن خوانندگان و نویسندگان فرهیخته م...
متن کاملROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
OBJECTIVE To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather than in primary studies). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We used four-stage approach to develop ROBIS: define the scope, review the evidence base, hold a face-to-face meeting, and refine the tool through piloting. RESULTS ROBIS is currently aimed at four broad categories of reviews mainly within he...
متن کاملAn Introduction to Umbrella Reviews
سخن سردبیر Editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره هجدهم، مهر 1398، 622-621 درآمدی بر مرور چتری An Introduction to Umbrella Reviews محسن رضائیان[1] M. Rezaeian آیونیدیس (Ioannidis) در سال 2009 میلادی توضیح روشنی از مرور چتری (Umbrella review) ارائه کرده است. وی توضیح می‌دهد که یک مرور چتری به طور نظام‌مند به جمع‌بندی و ارزشیابی نتایج حاصل از چندین مرور نظام‌مند و ی...
متن کاملSystematic Reviews to Support Evidence-based Medicine
I would argue that it is knowledge of clinical epidemiology, not statistics, which makes medical literature accessible. If you are trying to improve your understanding of published medical literature, a book on statistics will probably not help. Instead, consult any of the widely available evidence based medicine handbooks or articles from the BMJ or JAMA. These will have enough detail to preve...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0895-4356
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.013